![](https://krzyston.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/pexels-sora-shimazaki-5669602.jpg?w=703)
Stephen Krzyston acquired his juris doctor (JD) from Charleston School of Law in 2012 and serves as a criminal defense lawyer at Cavanaugh & Thickens in Columbia, South Carolina. He represents clients in state and federal criminal cases. In addition, Stephen Krzyston has experience in cases that involve blood splatter interpretation, DNA testing, and field sobriety testing.
Police officers administer field sobriety tests like the one-legged stand when they suspect a driver is driving under the influence and pull them over. The tests aim to help officers determine an individual’s sobriety level. However, drivers can refuse to perform the tests.
Officers can arrest drivers when they comply with the officer’s request to perform the tests and fail. But, drivers can challenge the results and validity of the officer’s judgment in court. For example, criminal defense lawyers can argue that the officer failed to administer the test correctly.
Criminal defense lawyers can also argue that an officer failed to give the defendant explicit instructions when administering the test. Finally, if the defendant’s attorney can prove the officer made an illegal DUI stop, they can argue that all evidence gathered from the DUI stop is inadmissible.
You must be logged in to post a comment.